HomeOur PurposeOrder DVDContact UsBLOGElements of ConspiracyObject of ConspiracyInstructions to JuryQuestions to Jury - EventsQuestions to Jury - Defendants

Instructions from the Hypothetical Judge:

 

1.      Remember, as a juror in this Criminal Conspiracy to Commit Domestic Terrorism to alter America’s foreign and domestic policy trial, you are NOT here to find out or determine exactly what happened on 9/11/01. Rather, you are to find, or not find, that what the Defendants said happened did not happen and that they knew it was a lie.

2.      It is not the job of the Plaintiff to prove to you every thing that did happen on 9/11/01 but rather to show and prove that what the Conspirators said happened did not happen and that the Conspirators took steps to cover up in some way what happened.

3.      You are to find, or not find, that at least one of the Conspirators committed an act of terror defined as the threat or commission of harm in furtherance of the goal or object of this Criminal Conspiracy to alter American Political Policy and re-shape the world’s political understanding.

3.1.   Also, you are to find, or not find, that every conspirator so named exhibited behavior that implies that they were in agreement with the purpose and object of the Conspiracy;

3.2.   The actions that imply agreement with the purpose and object of the Conspiracy may be either lawful or unlawful.

3.3.   Remember however that Conspirators need not know every detail of what is to take place to further the goal and object of the Conspiracy;

3.4.   Neither do the Conspirators need to know each other or the role of each person or actor in the Conspiracy.

4.      The object or goal of this Criminal Conspiracy to Commit Domestic Terrorism consists of the following:

4.1.   In this case the harm done to implement the goal or object was to destroy the near condemned WTC with people in it and blame it on “radical Muslims.”

4.2.   To further the object of the Conspiracy harm was used against the Pentagon to make the total event, blamed upon “radical Muslims,” an “act of war” against the United States, which would demand a military response rather than a mere international investigation of a crime against civilians. This was described by Defendants as a “New Pearl Harbor.”

4.3.   The ultimate goal or object of this Criminal Conspiracy was to re-shape the political world that would place the United States in an advantageous position in regard to its moral ability to intervene militarily and economically and control the natural resources in most any nation of the world for the supposed purpose of protecting the world from “global terrorism.”

5.      As a hypothetical juror you are to answer the questions that are posted under Questions to the Jury on each point of evidence related to the WTC, Pentagon and Shanksville.

5.1.   You are then to answer the questions regarding the role in the Conspiracy of each Defendant and determine if they were in agreement to the object of the Conspiracy or not.